Monday, 22 September 2025

The Physics of Debug-Later vs TDD (and Why Embedded Needs It)

Traditional “debug-later” (DLP) lets bugs age. As Td (time-to-discover) grows, Tfind (time-to-locate) explodes; Tfix often rises too as wrong assumptions accrete. 

TDD collapses Td → 0, keeping Tfind + Tfix minimal and predictable.

๐Ÿงช DLP vs TDD: Cause & Effect

  • DLP: Long Td ⇒ context fades, dependencies pile up ⇒ Tfind spikes; Tfix grows when bad code becomes a foundation.

  • TDD: Td ≈ 0 (immediate test failure) ⇒ revert last change or make a pinpoint fix; defects are prevented, not shipped.

๐Ÿ” The TDD Microcycle (Red–Green–Refactor)

  1. Add a small test (one behavior).

  2. Run all tests → red (fail/doesn’t compile).

  3. Implement the minimum to pass.

  4. Run all tests → green.

  5. Refactor (remove duplication, clarify intent), with tests guarding behavior.

Each loop: seconds to minutes. Feedback stays fresh; progress is measurable; breakages are obvious.

๐ŸงŠ Myth vs Truth

  • Myth: “Write lots of tests, then lots of code.”

  • Truth: Tiny test → tiny code → refactor. Small steps keep Td near zero.

๐Ÿ“ˆ TDD Benefits (Developer Reality)

  • Fewer bugs & regressions (fast feedback prevents drift).

  • Less debugging (defects die early).

  • Fewer side effects (tests codify assumptions/constraints).

  • Executable documentation (examples that don’t lie).

  • Design pressure (testable code ⇒ smaller, decoupled units).

  • Progress signal (green bar defines “done”).

  • It’s motivating (tight loops, visible wins).

๐Ÿ”Œ Why Embedded Especially Benefits

  • Hardware independence early: verify production code before boards exist or when access is scarce.

  • Shorter target cycles: remove bugs on host; flash less, learn more.

  • Faster HW debug: isolate HW/SW boundaries with test doubles.

  • Better architecture: decoupling for testability reduces tight coupling to peripherals.

✅ Conclusion

Treat defects like radioactive isotopes, halve their life. By keeping Td near zero, TDD minimizes Tfind and Tfix, turns specs into executable tests, and makes embedded code reliable, predictable, and change-friendly. DLP institutionalizes waste; TDD institutionalizes feedback.


Written By: Musaab Taha


This article was improved with the assistance of AI.


References:

Test-Driven Development for Embedded C,  James W. Grenning

No comments:

Post a Comment